<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Supergeekblog &#187; SGB Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://supergeekblog.com/category/sgb-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://supergeekblog.com</link>
	<description>All things Geeky</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 23:11:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1-alpha</generator>
		<item>
		<title>From Windows Vista to Windows 7 and Back</title>
		<link>http://supergeekblog.com/2010/07/from-windows-vista-to-windows-7-and-back/</link>
		<comments>http://supergeekblog.com/2010/07/from-windows-vista-to-windows-7-and-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thatedeguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SGB IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SGB Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SGB Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows rollback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supergeekblog.com/?p=850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My home desktop is several years old.  I don&#8217;t game much, so keeping up with the latest and greatest isn&#8217;t really on my list of things to do.  If you&#8217;re a gamer, you want the latest and greatest because it gives you a richer experience.  And it gives you an edge over the competition; if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My home desktop is several years old.  I don&#8217;t game much, so keeping up with the latest and greatest isn&#8217;t really on my list of things to do.  If you&#8217;re a gamer, you want the latest and greatest because it gives you a richer experience.  And it gives you an edge over the competition; if you&#8217;re playing multiplayer. But, I don&#8217;t, so it makes little difference to me what my frame rate is.</p>
<p>But, all of that is really not what were here for.  Which is a tale of an upgrade gone wrong.</p>
<p>About a month ago, I got one of those nasty bugs that it seems a computer will get occasionally.  I thought I got it cleaned off.  Maybe I did and what was left was something else, or maybe it was just a tougher bug than I thought.  Either way, my system was compromised.  I spent about 7 hours (over several days) trying to clean the thing off.  I even pulled the hard drive and brought it to work to scan it as a secondary drive (this is useful because most viruses load into memory on start up, but only if they are on the primary/boot drive), but to no avail.  So, rather than waste even more time trying to clean the thing up, I made sure everything was backed up and started fresh with a format and reinstall.</p>
<p>Once I got the reinstall of Windows Vista done, I went straight to Windows 7 using the upgrade that I had bought for it late last year.  The install/upgrade went incredibly smooth.  In previous versions of Windows, it was always preferable to install the full version of the new OS.  Something about the upgrade process just didn&#8217;t work well and you would get some nasty errors.  Windows 7s upgrade process is a bit different.  When you do the upgrade, it gives you the option of doing a format and full install.  Pretty awesome.  Except for the part where I reinstalled Vista first&#8230;  oops.</p>
<p>One full install later, and I had a brand new install of Windows 7.  My first impressions were very good.  A lot of the feel of Vista that I had gotten used to, but minus some of the clunky-ness.  Alas, it wasn&#8217;t to last.  About a week later, I awoke to a login prompt.  That was weird because I don&#8217;t normally log out my home pc.  So, it only gets a login when it restarts.  My first thought, of course, was to think that it was Windows Update that had caused the restart.  Until I came home at lunch and found it at a login prompt again.  [Cut through a couple days worth of technical tinkering]</p>
<p>The machine was set to restart on error.  So, everytime it got a system error, it would reboot.  And, after watching the machine for a while, I discovered that it would get a BSOD after about 20 minutes of idle time.  To shorten the story again, I did diagnostics on everything I could think of to figure out what the BSOD was being caused by.  I gave up after about a week and a half of that.  My assumption is that a update from either Windows or from a hardware related driver replaced a system file of some sort or was causing the problem.  A repair install was no help and I couldn&#8217;t do a system restore because it would cause a BSOD if you went into the system restore console.  Once again, I was faced with a format and reinstall.</p>
<p>Luckily, Jake was around to talk some sense into me.  I did the reinstall/restore, but I only went as far as Vista this time.  Perhaps at a later date, I&#8217;ll try the upgrade again, but until then, I&#8217;m sticking with Vista.  After all, it was pretty stable up until I got whatever I got and had to restore it the first time.  And, maybe, just maybe, Microsoft will fix it with the first Windows 7 service pack.</p>
<p>Either way, I think I&#8217;ll likely stick with Vista until the machine needs replacing.  Some of the machines hardware wasn&#8217;t just barely good enough for Windows 7, so it might be better to just wait until I need a new machine and get Windows 7 on that.</p>
<p><em>Authors note:</em> Jake suggested that I should write a post here (somewhat jokingly, I believe) as I&#8217;ve largely moved on to other things and Jake has taken full control of this site.  So, I thought I&#8217;d call him on his joke and surprise him with a post!  Surprise!  Also, if you like, my blog is over at <a title="Thatedeguy" href="http://www.thatedeguy.com" target="_blank">Thatedeguy</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://supergeekblog.com/2010/07/from-windows-vista-to-windows-7-and-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Launch Mult Apps at once</title>
		<link>http://supergeekblog.com/2009/01/launch-mult-apps-at-once/</link>
		<comments>http://supergeekblog.com/2009/01/launch-mult-apps-at-once/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob Barnard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SGB Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supergeekblog.com/?p=540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Lifehacker this morning comes a pretty neat util.  It seems to work rather well. Basically it allows you to set multiple apps to launch at once.  One idea that is mentioned is if you normally run a set of programs to cleaning files up etc.  I more see a use in terms of removing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5136437/utility-launcher-loads-multiple-apps-from-a-single-shortcut" target="_blank">From Lifehacker</a> this morning comes a pretty neat util.  It seems to work rather well.</p>
<p>Basically it allows you to set multiple apps to launch at once.  One idea that is mentioned is if you normally run a set of programs to cleaning files up etc.  I more see a use in terms of removing autostart programs and resetting them to a manual launch after boot.  (ie &#8211; launch IM, email, web.)  Doing that would improve boot time significantly if there are a lot of things that you tend to have come up on boot.  This way if you were in a hurry&#8230; you could be more selective and efficient.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jfbpage.com/" target="_blank">Check out Utility Launcher here.</a></p>
<p>[tags]Utility, windows apps, software, windows[/tags]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://supergeekblog.com/2009/01/launch-mult-apps-at-once/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Download Windows Vista Service Pack 2 Beta</title>
		<link>http://supergeekblog.com/2008/12/download-windows-vista-service-pack-2-beta/</link>
		<comments>http://supergeekblog.com/2008/12/download-windows-vista-service-pack-2-beta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob Barnard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SGB Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista Service Pack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supergeekblog.com/?p=501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those a little more daring: Vista SP2 has now hit the net. Yesterday Microsoft released Windows Server 2008 and Windows Vista Service Pack 2 Beta to the public. If you have been waiting for a second service pack for Windows Vista, give the new beta a shot! You can download Service Pack 2 for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those a little more daring: Vista SP2 has now hit the net.</p>
<blockquote><p>Yesterday Microsoft released Windows Server 2008 and Windows Vista Service Pack 2 Beta to the public. If you have been waiting for a second service pack for Windows Vista, give the new beta a shot!</p>
<p>You can download <a rel="nofollow" href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/dd262148.aspx" target="_blank"><strong>Service Pack 2 for Windows Vista and Server 2008</strong></a> here. Note that this is the beta version and the final version of the service pack is not expected to be released until April 2009. However, if you enjoy testing new service packs or want to test it out before deploying it to your network next year, try out the beta.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://helpdeskgeek.com/windows-vista-tips/download-windows-vista-service-pack-2-beta/" target="_blank">Aseem over at Help Desk Geek has a great write up on this.</a> He has included a list of updates/changes that come in SP2.  Like he mentioned above, it is important to remember this is *BETA* software.  It can potentially really screw up your machine.  (Vista Sp1 beta I really didn&#8217;t have any problems with.  WinXP SP1 I remember quite a few issues with.)  It all depends on your setup, the tweaks you make, and the various applications and drivers if it is going to play nice.</p>
<p>If Aseem sounds familiar, that is because <a href="http://www.supergeekblog.com/2008/11/wp-best-posts-summary/" target="_blank">his wordpress plugin &#8220;Best Posts Summary&#8221; has been reviewed here before</a>.  A big fan of the plugin, so kudos to him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://supergeekblog.com/2008/12/download-windows-vista-service-pack-2-beta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multi-machine solutions</title>
		<link>http://supergeekblog.com/2008/12/multi-machine-solutions-2/</link>
		<comments>http://supergeekblog.com/2008/12/multi-machine-solutions-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob Barnard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SGB Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kvm switch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi monitor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual desktop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supergeekblog.com/?p=474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a recap of the original article we did a couple of years ago.  A lot of people still haven&#8217;t heard of Synergy. If you have several machines lying around your &#8220;geek room&#8221; running various versions of Windows/Linux/OsX and can&#8217;t think of a good use for them. Well my desktop died, so currently just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a recap of the <a href="http://www.supergeekblog.com/2006/01/multi-machine-solutions/" target="_blank">original article we did a couple of years ago</a>.  A lot of people still haven&#8217;t heard of <a href="http://synergy2.sourceforge.net/" target="_blank">Synergy</a>.</p>
<p>If you have several machines lying around your &#8220;geek room&#8221; running various versions of Windows/Linux/OsX and can&#8217;t think of a good use for them. Well my desktop died, so currently just down to my laptop.  However till then, and for a while before I was using this application to seamlessly integrate the machines with a single keyboard/mouse.</p>
<p>You can now move your mouse over to my to another screen just by going off the left edge of one computer screen to the other. (Depending on setup of course.) At which point you will have full control of the laptop and can even copy and paste between them as if they were one machine. It is also free!<br />
<a href="http://synergy2.sourceforge.net/"> Check it out.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://supergeekblog.com/2008/12/multi-machine-solutions-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zone Alarm Pro &#8211; Free Today</title>
		<link>http://supergeekblog.com/2008/11/zone-alarm-pro-free-today/</link>
		<comments>http://supergeekblog.com/2008/11/zone-alarm-pro-free-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob Barnard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SGB Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supergeekblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zone Alarm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supergeekblog.com/?p=406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lifehacker brings us a useful tool &#8211; for free.  I haven&#8217;t tested the latest version of their product, but ZoneAlarm is known for making a solid piece of software. As [Lifehacker] mentioned yesterday, the normally $40 firewall and antivirus solution ZoneAlarm Pro is available for free today only, so if you&#8217;re interested in some free [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5091944/zonealarm-pro-free-promotion-is-on" target="_blank">Lifehacker</a> brings us a useful tool &#8211; for free.  I haven&#8217;t tested the latest version of their product, but ZoneAlarm is known for making a solid piece of software.</p>
<blockquote><p>As <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5091005/zonealarm-2009-pro-free-tomorrow-only" target="_blank">[Lifehacker] mentioned yesterday</a>, the normally $40 firewall and antivirus solution ZoneAlarm Pro is available for free today only, so if you&#8217;re interested in some free quality software, consider this your reminder to <a href="http://download.zonealarm.com/bin/free/sum/index.html" target="_blank">grab a copy</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>Today it is free.  Sign up and in 48hrs you will get a link to the software along with a serial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://supergeekblog.com/2008/11/zone-alarm-pro-free-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ashampoo&#8217;s Burning Studio</title>
		<link>http://supergeekblog.com/2008/10/ashampoos-burning-studio/</link>
		<comments>http://supergeekblog.com/2008/10/ashampoos-burning-studio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob Barnard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SGB Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ashampoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burning studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cd burning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supergeekblog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supergeekblog.com/?p=368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From LifeHacker &#8211; Ashampoo&#8217;s Burning Studio.  This works like a lot of other burning applications.  I like the smooth feel of it. Head over to LifeHacker and check it out!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5070552/ashampoo-burning-studio-free-handles-all-your-burning-needs" target="_blank">From LifeHacker &#8211;  Ashampoo&#8217;s Burning Studio</a>.  This works like a lot of other burning applications.  I like the smooth feel of it.</p>
<p>Head over to LifeHacker and check it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://supergeekblog.com/2008/10/ashampoos-burning-studio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome</title>
		<link>http://supergeekblog.com/2008/09/google-chrome/</link>
		<comments>http://supergeekblog.com/2008/09/google-chrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob Barnard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SGB Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SGB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supergeekblog.com/?p=325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This really isn&#8217;t much of a shock, but has taken the net by storm.  Google has released it&#8217;s own browser.  Before getting into any specifics, I will give some first impressions.  I use IE6 at work (requirement), and Firefox3 with various extentions.  (FF being my browser of choice at the moment.)  That being said &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This really isn&#8217;t much of a shock, but has taken the net by storm.  Google has released it&#8217;s own browser.  Before getting into any specifics, I will give some first impressions.  I use IE6 at work (requirement), and Firefox3 with various extentions.  (FF being my browser of choice at the moment.)  That being said &#8211; Chrome is impressive.  I have seen massive speed improvements in my normal sites.  (Google Reader being the most impressive speed difference, though I should have expected that.)</p>
<p>There has been some dissention out there.  Chrome is too basic, doesn&#8217;t yet support Extentions, new version of Firefox (3.1) will make this pointless, the <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080903-google-on-chrome-eula-controversy-our-bad-well-change-it.html" target="_blank">Default EUAL</a>, etc.  Some of these have a valid point. Â On the other hand &#8211; it is a rock solid beta application. Â How many other betas have we gotten from MS that crashed repeatedly. Â FF has been pretty good about this in its newer versions.</p>
<p>Follow some of the links above for more information, I will also be posting some resources links below. Â I would encourage people out there to try it for themselves and form their own oppinion. Â I for one am looking forward to seeing what it becomes, though not ready yet to make a full switch from Firefox. Â (The process per tab works really well.)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/" target="_blank">Google Chrome Comic Book</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/chrome" target="_blank">Google Chrome Download</a></p>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080902-hands-on-with-chrome-googles-browser-shines-mostly.html" target="_blank">ArsTechnica Review of Chrome</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://supergeekblog.com/2008/09/google-chrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista hater?  It&#8217;s harder, but XP can still be had&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://supergeekblog.com/2008/07/vista-hater-its-harder-but-xp-can-still-be-had/</link>
		<comments>http://supergeekblog.com/2008/07/vista-hater-its-harder-but-xp-can-still-be-had/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakob Barnard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SGB Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geeksaresexy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olorinpc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supergeekblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winxp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supergeekblog.com/2008/07/vista-hater-its-harder-but-xp-can-still-be-had/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out Mark&#8217;s post on how to get your hands on XP. Officially it can&#8217;t be had anymore. Windows XP has been retired but you can still get it Mark has pointed out a source for us to try and get it. If you get a new machine with Vista on it, building a PC [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out Mark&#8217;s post on how to get your hands on XP.  Officially it can&#8217;t be had anymore.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/07/02/windows-xp-has-been-retired-but-you-can-still-get-it/">Windows XP has been retired but you can still get it</a></p>
<p>Mark has pointed out a source for us to try and get it.  If you get a new machine with Vista on it, building a PC for mom, etc &#8211; might be worth the effort to try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://supergeekblog.com/2008/07/vista-hater-its-harder-but-xp-can-still-be-had/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skype Goes Verball</title>
		<link>http://supergeekblog.com/2006/07/skype-goes-verball/</link>
		<comments>http://supergeekblog.com/2006/07/skype-goes-verball/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Irrision</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SGB Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skype phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skype verballs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verballs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supergeekblog.com/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever wanted a talking internet telephone?  Of course you have. Well, let me introduce you to the Verballs.  These animated little characters move wave their arms all around when you receive a Skype call and then move their mouths to mimic the speech of whomever you are speaking with. The website has five different varieties [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever wanted a talking internet telephone?  Of course you have.</p>
<p>Well, let me introduce you to the <a title="Verballs" href="http://www.verballs.com/default.aspx" target="_blank">Verballs</a>.  These animated little characters move wave their arms all around when you receive a Skype call and then move their mouths to mimic the speech of whomever you are speaking with.</p>
<p>The website has five different varieties and it looks like they will be widely available on September 1 2006.  Each has his/her own story that can be played via the flash interface on the website.  Get all five and rotate depending on who you&#8217;re talking with!  The looks are close enough, it could be almost like talking to <a title="Olorinpc" href="http://www.olorinpc.com" target="_blank">Jake</a> in person!</p>
<p>Thanks to <a title="RedFerret" href="http://www.redferret.net/?p=7287" target="_blank">The Red Ferret Journal</a> for the pointer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://supergeekblog.com/2006/07/skype-goes-verball/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This install of Windows will self destruct in 30 days</title>
		<link>http://supergeekblog.com/2006/06/this-install-of-windows-will-self-destruct-in-30-days/</link>
		<comments>http://supergeekblog.com/2006/06/this-install-of-windows-will-self-destruct-in-30-days/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thatedeguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SGB News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SGB Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kill switch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Genuine Advantage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supergeekblog.com/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ed Bott at ZDNet is reporting that Microsoft will soon make installation of WGA (Windows Genuine Advantage) mandatory. Not only will it become a mandatory install, if WGA isn&#8217;t installed within 30 days, the install of Windows will cease to operate. If WGA becomes mandatory, would it mean that Microsoft could prevent Windows from working [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed Bott at ZDNet is <a title="WGA Mandatory Kill Switch" href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=84" target="_blank">reporting that Microsoft will soon make installation of WGA (Windows Genuine Advantage) mandatory</a>.  Not only will it become a mandatory install, if WGA isn&#8217;t installed within 30 days, the install of Windows will cease to operate.</p>
<blockquote><p>If WGA becomes mandatory, would it mean that Microsoft could prevent Windows from working if it determines  possibly erroneously that your copy isn&#8217;t &#8220;genuine&#8221;? That&#8217;s a chilling possibility, and Microsoft refuses an easy opportunity to deny that that option is in its plans.</p></blockquote>
<p>Chilling indeed.  Maybe it&#8217;s not such a bad time for Bill Gates to retire.  If MS truly decides to make a &#8220;kill switch&#8221; out of WGA, it could be the boost for Apple X and Linux that they&#8217;ve both been waiting for.  I&#8217;ve already had a few problems with WGA on my home PC and have seriously considered making the full time switch.  Not because I want to, but WGA is annoying at best.  I don&#8217;t like that it &#8220;phones home&#8221; either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://supergeekblog.com/2006/06/this-install-of-windows-will-self-destruct-in-30-days/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
